Last Update: October 07, 2024 3:36 PMXML
Next Update: November 5, 2024 8:45 PM
Voter registration total: 0
Current voter turnout: 0%
Precincts that have reported in-person results: 0 of 514 (0.00%)

PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT

UNITED STATES SENATOR (term ending January 3, 2031)

UNITED STATES SENATOR (remainder of the current term ending January 3, 2025)

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 2

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 11

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 12

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 15

STATE SENATOR, DISTRICT 7

STATE SENATOR, DISTRICT 11

STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER, DISTRICT 12

STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER, DISTRICT 17

STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER, DISTRICT 18

STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER, DISTRICT 19

MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION

TRUSTEE, COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD

BART BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DISTRICT 7

BART BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DISTRICT 9

MAYOR (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DISTRICT 1 (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DISTRICT 3 (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DISTRICT 5 (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DISTRICT 7 (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DISTRICT 9 (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DISTRICT 11 (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

CITY ATTORNEY (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

SHERIFF (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

The “Round 1” column shows the number of votes each candidate received after applying the ranked-choice voting method. This total includes all first-choice votes and any votes advanced from later rankings if a voter did not select a first-choice candidate. This process of advancing votes is known as normalization.

The “Last Round” column shows the vote totals for the two candidates who received the most votes after applying the ranked-choice method. Candidates with the fewest votes have been eliminated, and only the votes for the remaining two candidates are listed. For detailed information, view the preliminary round-by-round results of this contest. Note that until the results are final, eliminated candidates and round-by-round results may be subject to change.

TREASURER (Ranked-Choice Voting Contest)

This office is elected using ranked-choice voting. However, the Department did not apply the ranked-choice voting method to this contest since only one candidate appeared on the ballot and there were no qualified write-in candidates. The table below shows the number of first-choice votes received by the one candidate based on the total number of ballots counted.

PROPOSITION 2 — AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FACILITIES. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 3 — CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO MARRIAGE. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

PROPOSITION 4 — AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR SAFE DRINKING WATER, WILDFIRE PREVENTION, AND PROTECTING COMMUNITIES AND NATURAL LANDS FROM CLIMATE RISKS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 5 — ALLOWS LOCAL BONDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE WITH 55% VOTER APPROVAL. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

PROPOSITION 6 — ELIMINATES CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION ALLOWING INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE FOR INCARCERATED PERSONS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

PROPOSITION 32 — RAISES MINIMUM WAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 33 — EXPANDS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS’ AUTHORITY TO ENACT RENT CONTROL ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 34 — RESTRICTS SPENDING OF PRESCRIPTION DRUG REVENUES BY CERTAIN HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 35 — PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR MEDI-CAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 36 — ALLOWS FELONY CHARGES AND INCREASES SENTENCES FOR CERTAIN DRUG AND THEFT CRIMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

MEASURE A — Schools Improvement and Safety Bond

MEASURE B — Community Health and Medical Facilities, Street Safety, Public Spaces, and Shelter to Reduce Homelessness Bond

MEASURE C — Inspector General

MEASURE D — City Commissions and Mayoral Authority

MEASURE E — Creating a Task Force to Recommend Changing, Eliminating, or Combining City Commissions

MEASURE F — Police Staffing and Deferred Retirement

MEASURE G — Funding Rental Subsidies for Affordable Housing Developments Serving Low Income Seniors, Families, and Persons with Disabilities

MEASURE H — Retirement Benefits for Firefighters

MEASURE I — Retirement Benefits for Nurses and 911 Operators

MEASURE J — Funding Programs Serving Children, Youth, and Families

MEASURE K — Permanently Closing the Upper Great Highway to Private Vehicles to Establish a Public Open Recreation Space

MEASURE L — Additional Business Tax on Transportation Network Companies and Autonomous Vehicle Businesses to Fund Public Transportation

MEASURE M — Changes to Business Taxes

MEASURE N — First Responder Student Loan and Training Reimbursement Fund

MEASURE O — Supporting Reproductive Rights