Why Election Results Change After Election Night
At the end of Election Night, the Department of Elections reports results from all polling places. However, there are ballots that cannot be processed on Election Night, including vote-by-mail ballots that the Department of Elections receives on Election Day, provisional ballots that are cast at polling places, and ballots with write-in votes. In general, it takes the Department two weeks or more to process these ballots. Each afternoon after Election Day the Department will release a cumulative report that includes provisional and vote-by-mail ballots processed that day.
All aspects of the election process are open to public view, so candidates, members of the media and the public may observe signature verification and processing of provisional and vote-by-mail ballots and write-in votes.
Official Statement of Votes (XLS)
Official Statement of Votes (PDF)
Neighborhood and District Statement of Votes(PDF)
Neighborhood Turnout (XLS)
Neighborhood Turnout (PDF)
Official RCV Results
Mayor
District Attorney
Sheriff
| 429 out of 429 precincts (100%) |
| Last Updated: July 08, 2014 19:03:08 |
| Registration | 464380 |
| Total Ballots Cast | 197242 |
| Turnout | 42.47% |
| District Attorney | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| GEORGE GASCÓN | 76043 | 41.5% |
| DAVID ONEK | 43319 | 23.64% |
| SHARMIN BOCK | 37854 | 20.66% |
| BILL FAZIO | 19172 | 10.46% |
| VU VUONG TRINH | 6567 | 3.58% |
| WRITE-IN | 283 | 0.15% |
| Sheriff | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| ROSS MIRKARIMI | 70204 | 38.4% |
| CHRIS CUNNIE | 51410 | 28.12% |
| PAUL MIYAMOTO | 49631 | 27.15% |
| DAVID WONG | 11274 | 6.17% |
| WRITE-IN | 287 | 0.16% |
| Mayor | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| ED LEE | 59663 | 30.72% |
| JOHN AVALOS | 37395 | 19.25% |
| DENNIS HERRERA | 21882 | 11.27% |
| DAVID CHIU | 17893 | 9.21% |
| LELAND YEE | 14566 | 7.5% |
| JEFF ADACHI | 12515 | 6.44% |
| BEVAN DUFTY | 9193 | 4.73% |
| TONY HALL | 6914 | 3.56% |
| MICHELA ALIOTO-PIER | 6620 | 3.41% |
| JOANNA REES | 3096 | 1.59% |
| TERRY JOAN BAUM | 1662 | 0.86% |
| PHIL TING | 1013 | 0.52% |
| CESAR ASCARRUNZ | 532 | 0.27% |
| WILMA PANG | 440 | 0.23% |
| EMIL LAWRENCE | 377 | 0.19% |
| PAUL CURRIER | 247 | 0.13% |
| WRITE-IN | 165 | 0.08% |
| WRITE-IN RODNEY HAUGE | 9 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN LEA SHERMAN | 9 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN HAROLD MILLER | 7 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN PATRICK MONETTE-SHAW | 5 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN ROBERT 'BOBBY' JORDAN | 3 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN DAVID VILLA-LOBOS | 3 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN GILBERT LOUIS FRANCIS | 2 | 0% |
| WRITE-IN JOHN EDWARD FITCH | 0 | 0% |
| Measure A - School Bonds | ||
| Shall San Francisco Unified School District repair and rehabilitate facilities to current accessibility, health, safety and instructional standards, replace wornout plumbing, electrical and other major building systems, replace aging heating, ventilation and air handling systems, renovate outdated classrooms and training facilities, construct facilities to replace aging modular classrooms, by issuing bonds in an amount not to exceed $531,000,000, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for school administrators' salaries? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| Yes | 134751 | 71.11% |
| No | 54754 | 28.89% |
| This measure requires 55% affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure B - Road Repaving and Street Safety Bonds | ||
| SAN FRANCISCO ROAD REPAVING AND STREET SAFETY BOND, 2011. To fix potholes and repave deteriorating streets in neighborhoods throughout San Francisco, repair and strengthen deteriorating stairways, bridges and overpasses, improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, improve disabled access to sidewalks, and construct and renovate traffic infrastructure to improve Municipal Transportation Agency transit reliability and traffic flow on local streets, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $248,000,000 in general obligation bonds subject to independent oversight and regular audits? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| Yes | 129175 | 68.02% |
| No | 60741 | 31.98% |
| This measure requires 66⅔% affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure C - City Pension and Health Care Benefits | ||
| Shall the City amend its Charter to adjust pension contribution rates for most current and future City employees based on the City's costs; reduce pension benefits for future City employees; limit cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits; decrease City contributions to retiree health care costs for certain former employees; require all current and future employees to contribute toward their retiree health care costs; change the composition and voting requirements of the Health Service Board; and make other changes to the City's retirement and health benefits systems? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| Yes | 129554 | 68.91% |
| No | 58460 | 31.09% |
| This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure D - City Pension Benefits | ||
| Shall the City amend its Charter to increase pension contribution rates for most current City employees based on the City's costs; reduce contribution rates and pension benefits for most future City employees; limit cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits; prohibit the City from picking up any employee's contribution for pension benefits; and make other changes to the City's retirement system? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| No | 124051 | 66.55% |
| Yes | 62358 | 33.45% |
| This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure E - Amending or Repealing Legislative Initiative Ordinances and Declarations of Policy | ||
| Shall the City amend its Charter to allow the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to amend or repeal initiative ordinances and declarations of policy that the Board of Supervisors or the Mayor place on the ballot and that the voters approve after January 1, 2012? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| No | 121248 | 67.13% |
| Yes | 59369 | 32.87% |
| This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure F - Campaign Consultant Ordinance | ||
| Shall the City amend its campaign consultant ordinance to redefine "campaign consultant;" require campaign consultants to file monthly reports; authorize the City's Ethics Commission to require electronic filing instead of paper reports; change the calculation of City fees campaign consultants must pay; and allow the City to change any of the ordinance's requirements without further voter approval while still permitting voters to make additional changes? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| No | 98800 | 56.12% |
| Yes | 77259 | 43.88% |
| This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure G - Sales Tax | ||
| Shall the City increase its local sales tax by 0.50% for up to 10 years to fund public safety programs and programs for children and seniors, unless the State increases its sales tax by either 1.0% before November 30, 2011 or 0.75% before January 1, 2016? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| No | 100506 | 53.87% |
| Yes | 86075 | 46.13% |
| This measure requires 66⅔% affirmative votes to pass. | ||
| Measure H - School District Student Assignment | ||
| Shall it be City policy to encourage the San Francisco Unified School District to change its student assignment system so that it places the highest priority on assigning each student to the school closest to home, after placing siblings in the same school? | ||
| Votes | Percent | |
| No | 91678 | 50.04% |
| Yes | 91525 | 49.96% |
| This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass. | ||